duty free art; art in the age of planetary civil war - hito steyerl

P.1 How can one think of art institutions in an age that is defined by planetary civil war, growing inequality, and proprietary digital technology?

P.3 Conflict is not a means to force a resolution of a disputed situation, but a tool to sustain it. A stagnant crisis is the point. It needs to be indefinite because it is an abundant source of profit: instability is a gold mine without bottom.

P.37 By now, more people than ever are able to upload an almost unlimited number of self-representations. And the level of political participation by way or parliamentary democracy seems to have dwindled in the meantime. While pictures float in numbers, elites are shrinking and centralising power. … Humans and things intermingle in ever-newer constellations to become bots or cyborgs. As humans feed affect, thought, and sociality into algorithms, algorithms feed back into what used to be called subjectivity. This shift is what has given way to a post-representational politics adrift within information space.

P.47 Not seeing anything intelligible is the new normal. Information is passed on as a set of signals that cannot be picked up by human senses. Contemporary perception is mechanic to a large degree.

P.56 If they are dreams, those dreams can be interpreted as condensations or displacements of the current technological dispositions.

P.58 Today, expressions of life as reflected in data trails become a farmable, harvestable, mixable resource managed by informational biopolitics.
⠀And if you doubt that this is another age of magical thinking, just look at the NSA training manual for unscrambling hacked drone intercepts. As you can see, you need to bewitch the files with a magic wand.

P.71 If models for reality increasingly consist of sets of data unintelligible to human vision, the reality created after them might be partly unintelligible for humans too. Images in which whole lives become patterns that autonomous machines use to gossip about you or pull the trigger.

P.71 He (Oleg Fonaryov) asked one question: What if human evolution responded to the change of light sources around us? For millions of years, the only light on earth came from the starts and the sun, maybe some fire or candles. Now there are a lot of electric lights and tons of screens. Not to speak of those postman documentaries flying through the bones of the dead and the living. In the history of evolution, organic bodies have changed to deal with changing environments. What senses, what organs will people grow to pick up invisible images? To decode data streams that we cannot presently detect? How will people evolve in order to adapt to an environment modelled on unintelligible images?

P.78 To brutally summarise a lot of scholarly texts: contemporary art is made possible by neoliberal capital plus the internet, biennials, art fairs, parallel pop-up histories, growing income inequality. Let’s add asymmetric warfare—as one of the reasons for the vast redistribution of wealth—real estate speculation, tax evasion, money laundering, and deregulated financial markets to this list.

P.186 If art is an alternative currency, its circulation also outlines an operational infrastructure. Could these structures be repossessed to work differently?